There is a trend on the net today with which I’m rapidly approaching my boiling point.
Everywhere I go: words.
While there is much beautiful writing, many transformational stories, and an abundance of powerful thought, there is also a deep cavern of meaningless words on the internet. Words modifying words strung together with other words.
Glittery sparkles of fresh fun words.
See what I mean?
I can read a whole blog post or ebook and not know what was said. The words sound pretty – they fit a niche or target a market – but they don’t mean anything.
When I see words coupled in unusual ways, I drill down to understand what deeper meaning the author is trying to expose by using words in that way. This likely stems from my ever so brief introduction to deconstructionism.
Deconstruction is not a dismantling of the structure of a text, but a demonstration that it has already dismantled itself. Its apparently-solid ground is no rock, but thin air.
– J. Hillis Miller
Layering words, creating relationships between them, and generally making writing “prettier” doesn’t aid in others understanding you. It obfuscates your meaning.
Do you know what your meaning is?
Do you know what your trying to say?
Or are you applying word after word to your digital page in order to try to understand yourself better?
Strip down. Get bare. What do you really want to say?
I don’t mean this to be a lesson in writing; I am hardly qualified to teach.
I do, however, mean this to be a lesson in getting real with what you really want to say to the world. We talk often about finding our “authentic selves” but talk little about our “authentic message.”
You are what you think. You are also what you say.
- Natalie Sisson
We get clearer about how we want to be in the world without getting clearer on how we want to engage the world.
We don’t exist as solitary beings. Even authentic ones. We exist as people in relationship to others – and our words are a very big way we understand those relationships.
To be clear, direct, and always mindful of our deeper meaning in language is one way to strengthen those relationships and better understand who we are.
Use beautiful, powerful words – but consider them carefully.
Some of my favorite wordsmiths – those with deep meaning & winsome words – are Kelly Diels | Alexandra Franzen | Elizabeth Howard | Kristen Tennant.
{ image by soukup }








Sigh… you’ve done it again. This post is so dead on for me today. I have really been struggling with what I want to say, or rather what I have to share that is not more fluff in the already over fluffed web of words. See that was a perfect example LOL. I am no writer in any official sense yet I have a strong drive to share my thoughts and that means writing. How do I give an “authentic” voice to my ideas? What is my “authentic message”. I think as you said I am often putting out less than fully formed ideas in trying to understand myself better. But isn’t that authentic in itself. Sometimes I wonder why I am driven to write at all. I am a visual artists after all, but that does not seem to be enough. I will be coming back to this post, will print it out even and give it much thought, because I don’t want to be another meaningless “sparkle of fresh fun words”.
BTW I have to mention a personal pet peeve in the form of the word JUICY. No offense to anyone but I am done with that word as a descriptor for any and everything these days. If I ever use juicy to describe anything other than juice smack me down please. Again no offense, some of my favorite bloggers are juicy users
I’m getting tired of “juicy” too – although, juicy does carry some really strong context for me… so, used by the right person, I still enjoy it.
In fact, Sparkle and Glitter are okay with me too – it’s not the individual words, ya know, it’s the way they’re used.
Oh – and I wouldn’t worry about putting out less than fully formed ideas! Mine almost always are – ha! But there is still a central message there – even if it’s “Would you help me figure this out?”
Thanks, Gwyn!
PS I think you are an excellent and to the point writer, and this is in fact a kind of writing lesson. Perhaps there is more of that to come?
I physically GULPED when I saw my name at the end of this post. WHY? Because I thought it was DIRECTED AT me, haha! In fact, I think it might still be.
BTW, you ARE a teacher. How’s THAT for a hammer to cerebral cortex of identity? Coaches aren’t goaders or cheerleaders or gasoline in the tank They are teachers.
Thanks for more of the wonder of you.
Ha!! No – not at all. I’m not directing this post at anyone in particular – I think if you’re consuming the digital medium at all right now, you’ve been guilty of spewing some of this out.
However, what I am directing it at is this notion that you can put sparkle or juicy or authentic or (hm…what’s something more masculine) tough-shit at the beginning of a phrase and somehow make it mean something more. Nope. Words are powerful – strong words are even more powerful, but when you string them together without really considering their relationship, they start to lose power.
Anyhow, I think you’re a very direct writer who also has a supreme mastery of what it means to craft beautiful phrasing.
Oh, and I know I’m a teacher – just not the writing kind
I love the image with this post, btw. It’s is very meta.
Great post Tara.
We’re not only busy trying to make it sound pretty but also trying to make ourselves sound clever.
And that’s not clever.
Sum up what you want to say in a sentence first and then say that.